ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Outcome of CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for the brain metastases in patients with Li Fraumeni syndrome.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLi-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome associated with germline TP53 mutations and an increased risk of radiation-induced malignancies, posing significant challenges in the management of brain metastases (BM). Data regarding the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for BM in this population remain limited.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients with LFS who underwent SRS for BM at our institution. Patient-level, lesion-level, and treatment-related data were collected. Outcomes assessed included local tumor control (LTC), overall survival (OS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), radiographic response, and treatment-related adverse events.
resultsA total of 5 patients with 16 BM lesions were treated with SRS. The median age at treatment was 49 years (range, 37-65). Lesions were typically small (median diameter 6.1 mm) and predominantly supratentorial (87.5%). Most lesions (93.7%) were treated with single-fraction SRS with a median prescribed dose of 24 Gy. LTC was 100% at 3 months, 6 months, and the last follow-up. Median OS and DPFS were 11.03 months (95% CI, 9.53-12.54) and 7.5 months (95% CI, 7.3-7.7), with all deaths attributable to systemic disease rather than neurological causes. Importantly, no cases of radiation necrosis or radiation-induced secondary malignancies were observed during a median follow-up of 45 weeks.
conclusionsSRS demonstrated a short-term favorable local control and safety profile for the treatment of BM in patients with LFS. Given the tendency for lesions to be small and multifocal, along with the need to minimize radiation exposure, SRS represents a rational, focal treatment approach in this high-risk population. However, longer follow-up and prospective studies are needed to better define long-term safety, particularly regarding the risk of radiation-induced malignancies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42149268What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.