Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42149885›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2026

The carbon footprint of surgical operations: 2023-2025 systematic review update.

Anna Savio, Beatrice Marchi, Andrea Roletto, Pierangelo Guizzi, Giuseppe Milano, Lucio Enrico Zavanella, Simone Zanoni

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna SavioDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2672-4130
Beatrice MarchiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea RolettoDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-5638
Pierangelo GuizziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ospedale di Gardone Val Trompia, Brescia, Italy.
Giuseppe MilanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Lucio Enrico ZavanellaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-643X
Simone ZanoniDepartment of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical care significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, with operating rooms consuming three to six times more energy than other departments relying heavily on single-use materials and anaesthetic gases. We conducted a systematic review of literature from 2023 to 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus and Healthcare LCA databases were searched, and eligibility criteria were applied. A total of 26 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on each study's scope and system boundaries, reported emission values, identified carbon hotspots, and any mitigation strategies evaluated. A structured quality assessment was conducted to evaluate the reliability of the included studies and to identify potential sources of bias. The included studies demonstrated wide variability in reported carbon footprints of surgery, ranging from under 5 kgCO₂e for minor procedures to over over 400 kgCO₂e for complex single-stage operations and approximately 1,000 kgCO₂e for whole multistage patient pathways. This systematic review underscores that surgical operations could have a significant carbon footprint, with emissions hotspots concentrated in consumable materials and energy consumption. It also reveals substantial variability and methodological heterogeneity in how surgical carbon footprints are calculated, pointing to the urgent need for standardized life-cycle based frameworks in surgical settings. Establishing common standards will enable more reliable benchmarking of surgical emissions and better comparisons across studies.

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintSurgical Procedures, OperativeCarbon DioxideGreenhouse GasesHumansOperating RoomsCarbon DioxideGreenhouse Gases

Identifiers

PMID42149885
PMCPMC13183196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.