Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42150797›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Minimum-Excess-Work Guidance: Score-Based Sampling with Experimental Data or Sparse Restraints.

Christopher Kolloff, Tobias Höppe, Emmanouil Angelis, Mathias Jacob Schreiner, Stefan Bauer, Andrea Dittadi, Simon Olsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher KolloffDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tobias HöppeTechnical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Emmanouil AngelisTechnical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Mathias Jacob SchreinerDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stefan BauerTechnical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Andrea DittadiTechnical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Simon OlssonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3927-7897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surrogate models, such as Boltzmann generators (BGs) and emulators (BEs), based on deep generative models are becoming an important tool in molecular simulation. Often, we may want to use additional external information such as sparse experimental data to refine these models. However, there is no unique way to achieve this goal. Here, we propose a method inspired by thermodynamic work from statistical mechanics to regularize the guidance of pretrained probability flow generative models (e.g., continuous normalizing flows or diffusion models) to match additional sparse information. The regularization ensures that the

Identifiers

PMID42150797
PMCPMC13255250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.