ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026
Evaluating the effectiveness of the 'patient transport' app in improving healthcare quality, patient safety, and workflow efficiency.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient transport is a critical component of hospital operations, requiring precise communication across departments to ensure patient safety. However, research remains limited regarding digital communication tools for patient transport, particularly for older adults, who are at a high risk of safety events. To evaluate the quality improvement, usability, and work utility of the Asan Patient Transport Team app, a smartphone application was designed to facilitate patient transport and communication in a large tertiary hospital.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 118 patient transport staff and 62 transport requesters at Asan Medical Centre. The survey evaluated the effectiveness of the app based on six aims of the Institute of Medicine for healthcare improvement, with the addition of patient engagement and communication, resulting in a total of eight assessed domains. Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale, work utility was analysed through workflow assessment, and specific challenges related to transporting older patients were also examined.
resultsEffectiveness was reflected in the reported improvements in efficiency (62%), timeliness (60.9%), and patient safety (60%). The app significantly enhanced communication between transport staff and medical personnel, particularly regarding task assignments and transport status updates. Concerning older patient transport, 80.5% of transport staff identified age-specific challenges, including insufficient information about mobility status (70.3%) and communication abilities (71.2%). The staff strongly supported the need for additional patient data, particularly information on fall risk (72.9%) and monitoring device details (73.7%). The Asan Patient Transport Team app achieved a 'Good' System Usability Scale score of 73.2. The survey found that the app positively affected work utility across workflows.
conclusionThe Asan Patient Transport Team app demonstrates significant potential to improve patient transport efficiency, safety, and communication. While good usability and high user satisfaction are indicated, opportunities for refinements exist, particularly in addressing the unique needs of older patients. As healthcare continues to digitize, tools such as the Asan Patient Transport Team app are crucial to optimizing hospital operations and enhancing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.