ArticleChemical biology & drug design2026
Peptides as a Therapeutic Alternative Against Leishmaniasis: A Scoping Review.
Article in Chemical biology & drug design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease with high global health and socioeconomic burden, particularly in low-income regions where current treatments remain limited by high toxicity, cost, and increasing resistance. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), small bioactive molecules with broad-spectrum activity and low propensity for resistance, have emerged as promising therapeutic candidates. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on AMPs with anti-leishmanial activity, updating and expanding upon previous reviews. Following the PRISMA-ScR framework, we systematically searched for primary research articles assessing natural and synthetic peptides through in vitro or in vivo approaches. Seventy-nine studies met eligibility criteria, evaluating 231 unique peptides against multiple Leishmania species. Most investigations were in vitro, particularly on L. major promastigotes and amastigotes. Synthetic and bioengineered peptides demonstrated superior efficacy and selectivity compared with natural peptides, in some cases achieving selectivity indices exceeding 6000. Mechanistic studies revealed that AMPs act primarily through parasite membrane disruption, but also by inducing apoptosis-like processes and modulating host immune responses. Despite their promise, several challenges remain, including peptide instability in physiological conditions, proteolytic degradation, and limited in vivo validation. Advances in chemical modifications and nanocarrier-based delivery systems show potential to overcome these barriers. In conclusion, AMPs represent a compelling avenue for leishmaniasis therapy, especially for cutaneous forms of the disease. However, further studies, particularly in vivo, are critical to translate preclinical findings into clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.