ReviewJournal of chiropractic medicine2025
Disability and Functionality Measures in Patients With Acute Ankle Sprain: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this review was to identify how disability and functionality were measured in patients with acute ankle sprain and present according to the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health (ICF). Methods: We conducted a scoping review of randomized controlled trials including participants with acute ankle sprain. We conducted the searches in 4 databases to identify the studies. The searchers considered the inception of databases up to February 2024, without language restrictions. The process of evidence selection and data extraction was conducted independently. The summarization of evidence was presented according to the ICF. Results: We included 49 randomized controlled trials. The most common way disability and functionality were assessed in the included studies was through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) 35 (71.4%), and the most used PROM was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Most of the tools used to measure disability and functionality fall under the participation domain of the International Classification of Functioning, followed by activity. Conclusion: Disability and functionality in randomized controlled trials of acute ankle sprain is usually assessed through PROMs. The most comprehensive item of the ICF was participation, followed by activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.