Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152906›Full record

ArticleJournal of chiropractic medicine2025

Musculoskeletal Cognitive Competency Among Chiropractic Students at a South African institution: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Jordyn Casey Hawthorne, Christoper James Yelverton, Fatima Ismail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordyn Casey HawthorneDepartment of Chiropractic, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
Christoper James YelvertonDepartment of Chiropractic, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
Fatima IsmailDepartment of Chiropractic, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the musculoskeletal (MSK) cognitive competency among 1st and 2nd-year Master of Health Science (MHSc) chiropractic students at the University of Johannesburg. Methods: This cross-sectional, quantitative, and exploratory study used an adapted Freedman and Bernstein Basic Competency Examination (BCE) assessment distributed anonymously and online to the MHSc (n = 50) students at University of Johannesburg between 6 December 2022 to 17 March 2023. Statistical analyses included frequencies, descriptive statistics, and cross-tabulations to identify patterns or interrelationships. Results: The survey achieved a 90% response rate (n = 45) from the 2022 MHSc students: 46.7% (n = 21) were 1st-year students and 53.3% (n = 24) were 2nd-year students. The participants of this study achieved a mean score of 79.58% (95% confidence interval, 75.9%-83.7%) for the 20-item Freedman and Bernstein BCE. The minimum score achieved by the participants was 11.50 (57.50%) and the maximum score achieved was 20.00 (100.00%). Statistically significant differences were observed between the 1st- and 2nd-year cohorts on the Freedman and Bernstein BCE, particularly in content and clinically based areas. Conclusion: This study showed that this group of MHSc chiropractic students at the University of Johannesburg demonstrated strong cognitive competency in the MSK system using an adapted standardized assessment, highlighting adequate chiropractic training and student preparedness in managing MSK conditions.

Indexed as

ChiropracticClinical competenceGlobal burden of diseaseMusculoskeletalStudent

Identifiers

PMID42152906
PMCPMC12803972

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.