ArticleClinical and experimental gastroenterology2026
Assessment of the Biological Effect of Oral Ginkgolic Acid Liposome Nanoparticles for Treating Refractory
Article in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the antibacterial effect of ginkgolic acid (GA) modified into liposome nanoparticles (TLM@GA) against Methods: A new complex that improved GA stability and bioavailability was constructed using liposome nanoparticles (TLM@GA). The construction of the complex was verified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Zeta potential, and particle size detection, and its physicochemical properties were comprehensively evaluated. An acute gastritis model was also established using C57BL/6 mice, in which the in vivo therapeutic effect of TLM@GA was evaluated by detecting the colonization amount of the clinical multi-resistant strain HPBS001 in the gastric mucosa. Additionally, the pathological inflammation of the gastric mucosa was observed with H&E staining, apoptosis of gastric mucosal cells was observed with TUNEL staining, and the expression of serum inflammatory factors was detected with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The in vivo safety of TLM@GA was evaluated by detecting its effect on mouse body weight and the damage to the stomach, liver, spleen, and kidneys. Results: The TLM@GA complex had excellent stability and dispersibility. The minimum inhibitory concentration of GA against Conclusion: TLM@GA had excellent stability, efficient release, and good loading capacity efficiency. It was significantly superior to GA in terms of in vitro antibacterial activity, had low toxicity, was not prone to drug resistance, and demonstrated high safety. TLM@GA demonstrated a good antibacterial effect in the in vivo acidic environment, effectively slowing the apoptosis of gastric mucosal cells and significantly reducing levels of inflammatory factors, alleviating the inflammatory response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.