ReviewActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2026
The neck matters: optimising lymph node management in laryngeal cancer.
Review in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Is Level IIB Dissection Necessary in the Clinically N0 Neck? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Head & neck · 2026Pooled it
- The role of elective neck dissection in parotid acinic cell carcinoma: a systematic review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Transoral robotic surgery for glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and patient-level analysis of surgical, functional, and oncologic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic determinants of overall, disease-specific and recurrence-free survival in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) accounts for nearly one quarter of head and neck malignancies, with cervical nodal status representing the strongest prognostic factor. This review aims to summarise evidence on neck management across different clinical scenarios. Methods: A narrative review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to July 2025. Original studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines were included. Data were analysed according to clinical setting: cN0, cN+, rcN+, and rcN0. Results: In primary cN0 LSCC, the risk of occult nodal disease is site-dependent. Supraglottic tumours show the highest incidence (20-50%, > 50% in T3-T4), supporting elective bilateral selective neck dissection (SND) of levels II-IV, with level VI in selected cases. Early glottic tumours rarely metastasise (< 10%) and may be observed, while advanced glottic and subglottic tumours show higher risk (15-30%), justifying elective treatment. In cN+ disease, SND is indicated for N1-N2 and modified radical neck dissection for N3. Regional recurrence occurs in 15-25% of cases. In rcN+ disease, salvage SND provides regional control comparable to comprehensive dissection with lower morbidity. The role of elective dissection in rcN0 remains controversial despite occult metastasis rates > 20% in high-risk tumours. Conclusions: Neck management in LSCC should be adapted to risk: elective treatment is essential in high-risk cN0 disease, therapeutic dissection remains standard in cN+, and salvage SND is effective in rcN+, while elective treatment in rcN0 should be reserved for selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.