ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
PancDS in Real-World Practice: A Prospective Multicenter Validation of a Clinical Decision-Support System Bridging Experience Gaps in Pancreatic Lesion Diagnosis.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinguishing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from mass-forming pancreatitis (MFP) is challenging due to imaging mimicry and reader-dependent variability. PancDS is developed as a biomimetic pancreatic decision-support system that integrates clinical predictors, a radiomics signature, and self-developed deep features (PANet). PancDS is enabled by TriFusionNet, an adaptive fusion strategy designed to emulate expert reasoning by dynamically reweighting modalities according to diagnostic relevance. In a retrospective multicenter cohort of 1006 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed resectable PDAC or MFP (2014-2023), 634 patients from Tongji Hospital were used for training/internal testing, and 372 patients from four independent hospitals for external testing. PancDS achieves internal and external AUCs of 0.936 (95% CI: 0.864-0.993) and 0.881 (95% CI: 0.833-0.924), respectively. In a reader study, PancDS significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, with the largest gains in intermediate and junior radiologists (P < 0.001) and minimal case-level deterioration (1.5-3.9%), functioning as a diagnostic equalizer. In a prospective consecutive cohort (Jan-Oct 2025; n = 151), PancDS achieves an AUC of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.725-0.978) and 94.7% accuracy. This practice-tested, prospectively evaluated system provides a reliable tool for PDAC-MFP differentiation, potentially informing surgical decision-making and enhancing diagnostic equity across diverse clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.