Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154367›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2026

Efficacy and Safety of Firsekibart in Patients with Acute Gout Unsuitable for Standard Therapy: 48-Week Results from an Open-Label Extension of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

Zaihua Zhu, Yu Xue, Tianshu Chu, Jiankang Hu, Wei Gou, Ning Zhang, Juan Li, Jing Yu, Rongping Li, Rongbin Li and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05983445 (Safety & Efficacy of Genakumab in Patients With Frequent Flares), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05983445 phase3completednot on this map

Safety & Efficacy of Genakumab in Patients With Frequent Flares

TypeinterventionalSponsorChangchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled313ConditionsAcute Gout ArthritisArmsgenakumab, placebo for Diprospan, placebo for genakumab, Diprospan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Zaihua ZhuDepartment of Rheumatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu XueDepartment of Rheumatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tianshu ChuDepartment of Rheumatology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiankang HuDepartment of Rheumatology, Pingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang, China.
Wei GouDepartment of Rheumatology, Hebei Petro China Central Hospital, Langfang, China.
Ning ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Juan LiDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Rongping LiDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Rongbin LiDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Hospital of Qiqihar, Qiqihar, China.
Long QianDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xinwang DuanDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Lihua DuanDepartment of Rheumatology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Qian XuChangchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (GenSci), Shanghai, China.
Fei GuChangchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (GenSci), Shanghai, China.
Yuling LianChangchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (GenSci), Shanghai, China.
Xu ZhangChangchun GeneScience Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (GenSci), Shanghai, China.
Hejian ZouDepartment of Rheumatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zhjhsar@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9762-2663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with recurrent acute gout flares who are unable to use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or colchicine have limited alternatives and remain at high risk of flare recurrence. Firsekibart is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-1βeta (IL-1β) The objective of this study is to evaluate the longer-term efficacy and safety of firsekibart through 48 weeks in patients with acute gout unsuitable for standard anti-inflammatory therapy.

methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled phase 3 study of firsekibart with compound betamethasone. Followed by a 24-week open-label extension (OLE), conducted at hospitals in China. The double-blind phase was conducted from Week 0 to Week 24, followed by an OLE through Week 48 and a 12-week safety follow-up period after the last dose. Adults with ≥ 2 acute gout flares in the past year and a contraindication, intolerance, or inadequate response to NSAIDs and/or colchicine were enrolled. Patients completing the double-blind phase entered the OLE, during which firsekibart was administered for acute gout flares as needed. Efficacy included proportion of patients experiencing ≥ 1 gout flare recurrence, number of flares per patient, and time to first recurrence through Week 48, as well as rescue medication use during the OLE. Exploratory outcomes included health-related quality of life and flare-related pain. Safety included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, and immunogenicity.

resultsOf 313 patients (double-blind phase), 300 entered the OLE. By week 48, gout flare recurrence occurred in 70 patients (44.9%) in the firsekibart group compared with 116 (74.8%) in the positive control group (difference - 29.97%; 95% CI - 40.228% to - 18.544%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median time to first recurrence was not reached with firsekibart versus 37 days with positive control, indicating a 70% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.223, 0.408; stratified log rank P < 0.0001] lower recurrence risk. Firsekibart maintained efficacy through Week 48. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 89.7% of patients in the firsekibart group and 89.1% in the positive control group, with no new safety signals identified during extended follow-up.

conclusionIn this open-label extension study, firsekibart demonstrated sustained efficacy in reducing gout flare recurrence through 48 weeks, with a consistent and favorable safety profile, and no new safety signals identified during extended follow-up.

trial registrationNCT05983445.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBetamethasoneGoutInterleukin-1betaAcute DiseaseAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBetamethasoneInterleukin-1betaAcute gouty arthritisExtension studyFirsekibartGoutOpen label

Identifiers

PMID42154367
PMCPMC13415669

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.