Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42154466›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Cognitive Trajectories and Subsequent Accelerometer-Measured Movement Behavior in Older Adults.

Mikaela Bloomberg, Laura Brocklebank, Clémence Cavaillès, Aiden Doherty, Séverine Sabia, Andrew Steptoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mikaela BloombergDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom.
Laura BrocklebankNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Clémence CavaillèsUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U1153, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, France.
Aiden DohertyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Séverine SabiaUniversité Paris Cité, Inserm U1153, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, France.
Andrew SteptoeDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Previous evidence suggests a bidirectional association between physical activity and cognitive function. It remains unclear whether long-term cognitive trajectories are associated with later differences in how older adults allocate time during the day between physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep. Objective: To assess whether long-term cognitive trajectories are associated with the subsequent amount of daily time in physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included community-dwelling adults aged 50 years or older at baseline and residing in England, using cognitive data from waves 1 (2002 to 2003) to 9 (2018 to 2019) and accelerometer data from wave 10 (2021 to 2023) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Exposures: Participant-specific annual rate of change in episodic memory (assessed via immediate and delayed recall) and verbal fluency (assessed via animal naming), estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The movement behavior composition, comprising mean daily minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity, light physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep time. Differences were estimated in time spent in each behavior between a less favorable memory or fluency trajectory (corresponding to the 25th percentile for participant-specific memory or fluency change), median trajectory (50th percentile), and a more favorable trajectory (75th percentile). Results: The study included 2529 participants (1394 [55.1%] female, 1135 [44.9%] male) with a mean (SD) baseline age of 56.1 (5.4) years. Compared with the less favorable memory trajectory, the more favorable trajectory was associated with 14 (95% CI, 8 to 21) more minutes of light physical activity and 12 (95% CI, -20 to -5) fewer minutes of sedentary behavior per day, with larger differences among participants older than 70 years (eg, 20 [95% CI, 11 to 30] more minutes light physical activity). Memory-related differences in moderate to vigorous physical activity and sleep were comparatively minor. Fluency showed similar patterns to memory, but time-use differences between trajectories were smaller. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of older adults, participants with less favorable long-term memory trajectories were subsequently less active and more sedentary, suggesting that later-life activity patterns may partly reflect cognitive change.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAgingCognitionExerciseSedentary BehaviorAgedCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSleepSleep Duration

Identifiers

PMID42154466
PMCPMC13187880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.