ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Impacts of the Pacific Northwest Heat Dome on preterm birth rates in Oregon and Washington State.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Dome produced the highest temperatures ever recorded in usually temperate Oregon and Washington State. Under climate change, events as extreme as the Heat Dome are forecasted once to twice per decade rather than once every thousand years. Among other health effects, extreme heat exposure increases risk of preterm birth. However, few studies have evaluated susceptible exposure windows for extreme heat during pregnancy, or quantified effects in historically unexposed populations like those in Oregon and Washington State.We treated the PNW Heat Dome as a natural experiment, and used 2016-2022 vital statistics records to estimate the gestation month-specific impact of the Heat Dome on preterm birth. Using an interrupted time series design with a synthetic control, we compared the observed odds of preterm birth in the exposed (in utero November 2020-July 2021) Oregon and Washington conception cohorts to counterfactual odds had the Heat Dome not happened. Our analysis included 716,096 exposed births across 67 monthly conception cohorts. Odds of preterm birth were higher than expected in cohorts exposed during months 2-3 (11% increase; 95% CI, 1-22) and months 6-7 (14% increase; 95% CI, 5-24) of pregnancy. We found that Heat Dome exposure during all trimesters increased preterm birth risk, and heat exposure in early pregnancy had a delayed effect on preterm birth risk, suggesting interventions to protect pregnant people from heat should span the entire pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.