ArticleJournal of clinical periodontology2026
Prognostic Assessment of Tooth Survival After Treatment of Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis retrospective cohort study aimed to identify pretreatment prognostic factors for tooth survival in teeth with endodontic-periodontal lesions (EPLs). MATERIALS AND
methodsTeeth with EPLs treated according to a standardised clinical protocol involving periodontal and endodontic treatments were included. Clinical parameters were measured, and the EPL grade was classified according to the 2017 World Workshop criteria. Based on the radiographic characteristics, lesions were categorised as I-shaped (unilateral intrabony defect without apparent apical radiolucency), J-shaped (unilateral intrabony defect with apical radiolucency) and U-shaped (bilateral intrabony defects with apical radiolucency). Survival-time analysis was performed.
resultsOf the 187 teeth included, 117 survived over the mean observation period of 3.1 ± 2.1 years (maximum, 8.4 years). The estimated 1- and 5-year tooth survival rates were 83.8% and 58.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age, EPL grade, probing depth (PD), periapical index, bone loss and I-J-U subclassification as significant prognostic factors for tooth survival. The I-J-U subclassification was significantly associated with tooth survival, suggesting its potential value in prognostic assessment.
conclusionThis retrospective cohort study identified age, EPL grade, PD and radiographic shape of bone loss as predicting factors for tooth survival in teeth with EPLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.