ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Ostial right coronary artery lesions: what to know and how to overcome.
Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ostial right coronary artery (RCA) lesions remains challenging and is associated with higher rates of restenosis and target lesion revascularization, even in the contemporary drug-eluting stent era. These unfavorable outcomes are largely attributable to the unique anatomical and histological characteristics of the aorto-ostial junction, including severe calcification, limited vessel compliance, and hinge motion. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have identified distinct morphological patterns of ostial RCA lesions, including isolated ostial lesions, diffuse atherosclerotic disease without calcified nodules, and lesions characterized by calcified nodules, which are associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Optimal management of ostial RCA lesions requires careful lesion assessment and tailored therapeutic strategies. For de novo lesions, adequate lesion preparation using high-pressure/scoring balloon dilation, rotational atherectomy (RA), or intravascular lithotripsy is essential to achieve optimal stent expansion. Precise ostial stent placement and intravascular imaging-guided optimization are critical procedural components, and drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy may be considered in selected cases with a high risk of restenosis. In-stent restenosis (ISR) of the ostial RCA is frequently driven by mechanical factors such as stent underexpansion or fracture. DCBs are the preferred first-line treatment for ISR, while additional lesion modification using high-pressure balloons, RA may be required in cases with significant mechanical constraints. This review summarizes current evidence on the morphology, mechanisms, and contemporary treatment strategies for ostial RCA lesions, with a particular focus on intravascular imaging-guided intervention and practical considerations in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42156663What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.