ArticleScientific reports2026
Comprehensive macroscopic living anatomy of the swine heart: comparative visual approach with virtual dissection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Swine is one of the major large animal species used in translational research. Extensive knowledge has been accumulated on the normal anatomy of the swine heart, highlighting its similarities with the human heart, including its size and coronary arterial system. However, when these hearts are compared three-dimensionally as they lie on each thorax without distortion, remarkable differences are recognized beyond already known similarities. Those differences include, but are not limited to, the cardiac axis, aortic axis, aortic arch plane, aortic arch/pulmonary trunk relationship, atrial appendages extent, pulmonary arteries/veins/trachea/bronchi relationship, left azygos vein drainage, coronary arterial orifices relationship, fossa ovalis/aortic root relationship, and ventricular trabeculations features. In addition to conventional and rough recognition of similarities between the swine and human hearts, detailed knowledge of differences in the living anatomy of the swine and human hearts is especially fundamental for conducting effective in vivo experiments, including fluoroscopic procedures and survival studies with surgical intervention. Also, this knowledge is useful for discussing the feasibility and limitations of applying the insights obtained from the swine heart study to the human heart. Thus, we herein demonstrate comprehensive macroscopic living anatomy of the swine heart compared with that of the human heart using cardiac computed tomographic datasets obtained from live swine, as well as datasets from recovered swine hearts after pressure-perfusion and fixation to maintain their physiological, non-distorted anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.