Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42156929›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2026

Elucidating structure-function relationships in the mammalian nucleolus.

Lin Shan, Yunsheng Sun, Sarah A Woodson, Ling-Ling Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lin ShanState Key Laboratory of RNA Innovation, Science and Engineering, New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7895-1429
Yunsheng SunT. C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-7568
Sarah A WoodsonT. C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. swoodson@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0170-1987
Ling-Ling ChenState Key Laboratory of RNA Innovation, Science and Engineering, New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. linglingchen@sibcb.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-0305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleolus is the site of ribosomal RNA synthesis and ribosome biogenesis. Advances in high-resolution imaging and next-generation sequencing have unveiled unprecedented details of its intricate architecture and dynamic organization. In this Review, we focus on the dynamic organization of mammalian nucleoli, while drawing selective comparisons with other organisms to highlight conserved and divergent principles of nucleolar organization. We discuss recent progress in deciphering the multilayered compartments of nucleoli, the physical principles driving their organization and dynamics, and their functional interplay during stepwise ribosomal RNA processing, ribosome assembly and maintenance of compartment integrity. We also discuss how disruptions of nucleolar structure-function relationships can drive cellular stresses and diseases, offering new opportunities for therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Cell NucleolusRNA, RibosomalAnimalsHumansMammalsRibosomesStructure-Activity RelationshipRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.