Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157192›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Women's empowerment and barriers to healthcare access in Burkina Faso: an ordinal logistic regression analysis of the 2021 DHS.

Narges Ebadi, Souleyman Diabate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narges EbadiSchool of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada. narges.ebadi.1@ulaval.ca.
Souleyman DiabateDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, CHU de Quebec Research Center-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough free healthcare policies for women have been implemented in Burkina Faso, access to essential services remains severely hindered by insecurity, climate shocks, and widespread displacement. As one of the most affected countries in West Africa by internal conflict and fragility, Burkina Faso provides a critical context for examining gendered health disparities. Yet, studies that address the aspects of women's empowerment in this country remain rare, despite their importance for understanding healthcare access. Against this backdrop, the present study investigates how women's empowerment dimensions, such as decision making, information and communication technologies (ICT) access, bank account ownership, and perceptions of justified violence, shapes healthcare access in Burkina Faso.

methodsA nationally representative sample of 12,868 partnered women aged 15-49 years was analyzed. Healthcare access was measured using a composite score based on four barriers: needing permission, financial constraints, distance to health facilities, and reluctance to seek care alone. Each barrier was coded as 1 (present) or 0 (absent), generating a total score from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater barriers. Key predictors included decision-making power, ICT access, bank account ownership, and acceptance of justified violence. To examine associations between healthcare access barriers and women's empowerment indicators, both unadjusted and adjusted ordinal logistic regression models were employed.

resultsAmong the sampled women, 29.6% reported no barriers to healthcare access, while 5.8% experienced all four. In adjusted ordinal logistic regression models, women with moderate autonomy in decisions had significantly lower odds of experiencing high healthcare barriers (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93), and those with high decision-making power had even lower odds (OR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.28-0.78). Acceptance of justified violence was associated with increased odds of high barriers (OR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.72-2.66). Women with the highest level of ICT access had markedly lower odds of facing high healthcare barriers (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.14-0.22).

conclusionThis study shows that women's empowerment dimensions, especially decision-making power and ICT access, substantially reduce healthcare barriers, while acceptance of justified violence increases them. Financial inclusion and sociodemographic factors such as higher education, urban residency, and household headship also improve access. These findings underscore the need to address both structural inequalities and restrictive norms to expand women's healthcare access in Burkina Faso. Limitations include the cross-sectional design, reliance on self-reported data, and lack of qualitative insights. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

EmpowermentHealth Services AccessibilityPower, PsychologicalWomen's RightsAdolescentAdultBurkina FasoDecision MakingFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedYoung AdultDecision-makingHealthcare accessICTJustified violence perceptionWomen’s empowerment dimensions

Identifiers

PMID42157192
PMCPMC13366899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.