ReviewInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Artificial intelligence and neurodegeneration: state of the art and explainability.
Review in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New Advances and Perspectives in Ophthalmology: Progress and Modern Challenges Toward Personalized Eye Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer disease (AD) and Parkinson disease (PD) are an increasing healthcare concern and growing cause of disability in our century. The advent of the artificial intelligence (AI) era and the early changes in retina and optic nerve morphology detected in neurodegenerative diseases by recent literature opened the way to the perspective of a AI-based diagnosis for both conditions. MAIN BODY: In AD a generalized decrease in macular Ganglion Cells-Inner Plexiform Layer (GC-IPL) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and peripapillary RNFL thickness has been documented. Moreover, clinical AD is characterized by a lower choroidal thickness and higher choroidal vascularity index. AI can be predicted with around 80% accuracy based on small fundus vessels characteristics. Similarly, AI based on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images showed very good performance in detecting AD, especially based on total macular volume (TVM) and GCL thickness. A combination of OCT and color fundus photographs (CFP) imaging reached 85% accuracy in detecting MCI. In PD typical retinal anomalies include a generalized thinning of the peripapillary RNFL with a degeneration pattern similar to the one of mitochondrial optic neuropathies, foveal pit widening, generalized retinal and retinal pigmented epithelium thinning and outer plexiform layer thickening. AI CFP-based detection of PD showed only 65% accuracy due to a low specificity, while multimodal imaging-based AI was the best approach, reaching a 100% sensitivity and 85% specificity.
conclusionIn consideration of the overall very good performance, AD and PD are likely to benefit from the support of retinal-imaging based AI for early diagnosis. To optimize the performance, especially in terms of specificity, the use of multimodal imaging and possible integration with meta-data has been demonstrated to be the best technique, especially for PD diagnosis. However, training and testing on a larger sample size and longitudinal evaluation of the chosen models will be needed before application on general population. So far, explainability of the proposed models seems robust and coherent with the corresponding central nervous system damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.