ReviewDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2026
Effects of Ginkgo biloba extract on glycemic control, inflammatory markers, lipid profile, anthropometric indices, and safety parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.
Review in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGinkgo biloba extract (GBE) is widely used as adjunct therapy in metabolic syndrome (MetS) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet its effects on glycemic control, lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, and safety remain incompletely characterized.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials, including 1,507 subjects, evaluated the impact of GBE supplementation on glycemic profile, lipid parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, anthropometric indices, and safety outcomes.
resultsCompared with controls, GBE significantly reduced FBG (WMD - 13.88 mg/dL; 95% CI -24.61 to -3.15; p = 0.01) and improved insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; WMD - 3.64; 95% CI -5.71 to -1.56; p < 0.01) but did not significantly alter HbA1c or insulin levels. GBE also decreased anthropometric measures, including BMI (WMD - 0.85 kg/m²; 95% CI -1.53 to -0.18; p = 0.01), waist circumference (WMD - 2.67 cm; 95% CI -4.97 to -0.37; p = 0.02), and visceral adiposity index (WMD - 48.09; 95% CI -66.74 to -29.44; p = 0.01). Effects on lipid profiles were mixed, with no significant changes in total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, or HDL cholesterol. Inflammatory markers CRP (WMD - 1.16 mg/L), TNF-α (WMD - 58.3 pg/mL), and IL-6 (WMD - 14.53 pg/mL) were significantly reduced (all p < 0.05). The safety study showed minor but statistically significant elevations in ALT and AST. However, the therapeutic value of these findings is questionable due to short trial durations and lack of threshold-level data. There was no clinical hepatotoxicity episodes reported. Subgroup analysis suggested that higher doses (≥ 120 mg/day) and short intervention duration (≤ 90 days) yielded greater improvements. Furthermore, Evidence of publication bias was detected for FBG, TG, CRP, WC, TNF‑α, and BUN (Egger's test p < 0.05).
conclusionsGBE is associated with moderate but statistically significant improvements in short-term glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, inflammatory state, and obesity indices in MetS and T2D patients. Given the small effect sizes, substantial heterogeneity, lack of HbA1c improvement, and the possibility that publication bias will inflate estimates for numerous outcomes, these data should be viewed as preliminary and hypothesis-generating; they do not support the use of GBE as a standalone or first-line therapy. While lipid profile improvements were inconclusive, the extract appeared safe with manageable liver enzyme elevations. Although there were no side effects in these short-term trials, the minor elevations in liver enzymes should be interpreted with caution. Long-term hepatic safety has not been shown, thus periodic monitoring of liver function is recommended for extended use. These results are preliminary due to significant heterogeneity and a short trial period. Larger, patient-centered trials are needed to determine the therapeutic importance of these biochemical alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.