ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The application effect of the 5E-microteaching integration model in the standardized training of general practitioners.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a "5E+AI" teaching model on science communication in medical students: a contribution to global health literacy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a training model combining 5E teaching and microteaching in improving clinical abilities, critical thinking, and learning satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs) in standardized training. Methods: Sixty general practice residents undergoing standardized training at Yan'an University Affiliated Hospital (Sept 2023-Sept 2025) were enrolled to minimize sampling bias, randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received 5E microteaching (participation, exploration, explanation, expansion, evaluation) with microteaching for skill documentation and feedback; the control group received traditional teaching. Group differences were assessed using the MINI-CEX, CTDI-CV, graduation evaluations, and a satisfaction questionnaire. Results: No significant baseline differences (sex, age) validated randomization. The experimental group outperformed the control in all MINI-CEX dimensions (all Conclusion: The "5E-Microteaching (integrated model)" effectively improves clinical competencies, critical thinking, and satisfaction among general practice residents, providing an empirical framework for competency-based innovation in general medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.