ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Cross-Vendor Validation of Proton Density Fat Fraction and T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative pancreatic MRI in diabetes mellitus: current advances and future directions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn chronic liver disease, fat and fibroinflammatory changes often coexist. However, their biomarkers, proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T PURPOSE: To assess multicenter, multi-vendor reproducibility of confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded (CSE)-MRI-based PDFF mapping and MOLLI-based T STUDY TYPE: Prospective phantom study. PHANTOM: Commercial PDFF-T FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T and 3 T multi-echo, three-dimensional spoiled-gradient-echo (SGRE) sequence for PDFF mapping, and MOLLI sequence (5(3)3 acquisition scheme) using two-dimensional SGRE readouts for T ASSESSMENT: PDFF and T STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), reproducibility coefficients (RDC), and linear regression analysis were used. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsPDFF showed overall excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.987, RDC = 3.7%), with increased variability at higher T DATA
conclusionThis phantom study demonstrated high reproducibility of PDFF, whereas T EVIDENCE LEVEL: N/A. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.