Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159309›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2026

Convergent symbioses: morphology, life history, and niche specialization in coral and lichen mutualisms.

Rosa Celia Poquita-Du, Maren Ziegler, Imke Schmitt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rosa Celia Poquita-DuSenckenberg-Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), 60325 Frankurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3124-203X
Maren ZieglerInstitute of Zoology, Marine Holobiomics Lab, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Imke SchmittSenckenberg-Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), 60325 Frankurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7381-0296

Funding

Centre for Translational Biodiversity GenomicsGoethe University's Open Access PublicationHessen State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts LOEWE/1/10/519/03/03.001(0014)/52
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corals and lichens represent some of the most diverse mutualistic symbioses in the marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Their evolutionary success is partly attributed to their association with internal, photosynthetic symbionts, which provide carbon and enable colonization of a wide-range of habitats. Although corals and lichens occupy fundamentally different ecosystems and are phylogenetically unrelated-corals are animals associated with dinoflagellates, while lichens are fungi associated with green algae/cyanobacteria-they share surprisingly many morphological, ecological, and life history traits. Here, we juxtapose morphology, reproduction, dispersal, symbiont acquisition strategies, and symbiont diversity in coral and lichen mutualisms, focusing mainly on the host and associated photobiont partner. We highlight how shared traits lead to convergent mechanisms of niche specialization, including adaptation to abiotic conditions through the formation of environment-specific host-symbiont combinations. The comparison enhances our understanding of evolutionary forces shaping these symbioses and provides a framework for evaluating their adaptive potential in a changing world.

Indexed as

AnthozoaLichensSymbiosisAnimalsBiological EvolutionEcosystemenvironmental flexibilityholobionthost-photobiont associationobligate symbiosisphotosymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID42159309
PMCPMC13285892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.