Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159683›Full record

ReviewBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026

Machine learning assisted technoeconomic assessment of microalgal biofuel production pathways.

Rashmi Singh, Mohaddeseh Abbaszadeh, Sai Kumar Punna, Suvarshitha Pusuluru, Melvin S Samuel, Selvarajan Ethiraj, Hanadi A Almukhlifi, Farhan R Khan, Ali Hazazi, Farid Menaa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rashmi Singh *Department of Physics, Institute of Applied Sciences and Humanities, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, 281406, India.
Mohaddeseh Abbaszadeh *W Booth School of Engineering Practice and Technology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. moha.abaszadeh@gmail.com.
Sai Kumar PunnaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77004, USA.
Suvarshitha PusuluruDepartment of Engineering Data Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77004, USA.
Melvin S SamuelDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA. melvinsamuel08@gmail.com.
Selvarajan EthirajDepartment of Genetic Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, School of Bioengineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Hanadi A AlmukhlifiDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Farhan R KhanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Shaqra University, Al-Quwayihah, Riyadh, 11971, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ali HazaziDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Security Forces Hospital Program, Riyadh, 11481, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Farid MenaaDepartment of Biomedical and Environmental Engineering (BEE), California Innovations Corporation (CIC), San Diego, CA, 92037, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into microalgal research is transforming biomass generation, biofuel synthesis, and wastewater remediation strategies. Sophisticated ML techniques, such as artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and genetic algorithms (GA), facilitate precise simulation and forecasting of highly intricate microalgal systems. Although constraints related to data accessibility and model scalability persist, ML-based methodologies are increasingly demonstrating their value in enhancing the sustainability and operational efficiency of microalgal processes. Simultaneously, technoeconomic analysis (TEA) has become an indispensable framework for assessing biorefinery viability through systematic evaluation of life-cycle environmental burdens. Recent progress in TEA methodologies has strengthened iterative design optimization, uncertainty quantification, and user accessibility via open-source computational platforms. Broader systems boundaries now account for policy mechanisms, performance during end-use phase, and international market dynamics, thereby reinforcing TEA's contribution to sustainable bioeconomic advancement. Collectively, these computational and analytical innovations are expediting the deployment of scalable and economically feasible microalgal technologies.Highlights The convergence of AI/ML technologies significantly advances microalgal biomass enhancement and biofuel process optimization. Chlorella remains a prominent genus investigated for biodiesel application owing to its elevated lipid accumulation and productivity. ML approaches, including ANN and SVM, effectively represent and simulate complex microalgal cultivation systems. Bibliometric evaluations indicate a rising research trajectory in AI/ML-driven microalgal studies. Persistent limitations include restricted data availability and challenges in scaling AI/ML frameworks to practical industrial environments.

Indexed as

BiofuelsMachine LearningMicroalgaeBiomassGenetic AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerSoft ComputingBiofuelsArtificial IntelligenceBiofuel ProductionBiomassBiowaste-to-BioenergyMachine LearningMicroalgae

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.