Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42159694›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2026

[Late complications after atrial fibrillation ablation : Diagnosis and management].

Thomas Deneke, Kinan Kneizeh, Andrea Brinker-Paschke, Arno P Bößenecker, Jakub Tomala, Ilkin Maharamli, Thomas Winkler, Matthias Pauschinger, Christopher Kowalewski

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas DenekeUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland. Thomas.Deneke@klinikum-nuernberg.de.
Kinan KneizehUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Andrea Brinker-PaschkeUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Arno P BößeneckerUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Jakub TomalaUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Ilkin MaharamliUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Thomas WinklerUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Matthias PauschingerUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Christopher KowalewskiUniversitäres Herzzentrum Klinikum Nürnberg, Campus Süd, Medizinische Klinik 8 mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Universität, Nürnberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed complications may occur up to weeks after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and are usually a consequence of initial injury during ablation and ongoing processes progressing to severe symptomatic but late-onset events. A structured clinical follow-up of patients to appraise for late complications is therefore imperative for all centers performing AF ablations. Late complications should also be reported when testing new ablation technologies. Red flag symptoms like fever, neurological events, and syncope but also delayed onset thoracic pain, dyspnea, exercise intolerance or gastrointestinal symptoms within the first months after AF ablation should trigger standardized diagnostic testing to evaluate for complications like esophageal injury/esophagoatrial fistula, gastroparesis, pulmonary vein stenosis (can become symptomatic even later), diaphragmatic paralysis, or late pericarditis/pericardial effusion. Whereas severe late complications are rare, the remote onset of associated symptoms warrants a high degree of awareness of all medical disciplines involved in the follow-up and also on the patient side to assure appropriate management without further delay. Indicative symptoms, incidences, and standardized management workflows for late complications like esophagoatrial fistula, gastroparesis, pulmonary vein stenosis, phrenic nerve injury/diaphragmatic palsy, and late pericarditis/pericardial effusion are discussed. Different imaging modalities have been used to clarify diagnosis and clinical relevance of these complications. Treatment options may range from wait-and-watch to emergency surgical interventions.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPostoperative ComplicationsGastroparesisHumansDelayed complicationsEsophagoatrial fistulaGastroparesisLate pericarditisPulmonary vein stenosis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.