ArticlePloS one2026
Impact of a culinary medicine intervention on diet and health metrics in patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated body mass index.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCulinary Medicine (CM), an educational approach blending the art of cooking with the science of medicine, has shown promise in improving diet and health outcomes. We conducted a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental evaluation of a CM program to promote cooking and healthy dietary intake.
methodsPatients with type 2 diabetes and elevated body mass index (>25) were recruited from primary care clinics in low-income neighborhoods. The program, delivered by a dietitian, includes five weekly 90-minute sessions on basic cooking skills with behaviorally-based nutrition education. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods pilot study with a pre-post survey design and post-program interviews was used to assess improvements in dietary behaviors, nutrition knowledge, and cooking skills.
resultsA total of 89 individuals enrolled (58 intervention, 31 control). Fifty (86%) intervention participants attended the sessions, and 45 (78%) completed post-intervention surveys, while 22 (71%) control participants completed post-intervention surveys. Compared to control, the intervention group showed statistically significant improvements in perceived health (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 16.15, 95% CI 3.47,75.23, p < 0.001) and cooking self-efficacy (Adjusted β = 0.43, 95% CI 0.03,0.84, p = 0.04), and a decrease in perceived barriers to healthy eating (Adjusted β = -0.64, 95% CI -1.21,-0.08, p = 0.03). We found a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c in the intervention group from pre- to post-test, though between-group comparisons were not statistically significant. All other behavioral, psychosocial, and biometric variables were non-significant but trended in the expected direction.
conclusionsThis study is feasible and acceptable. The CM program effectively promotes cooking skills and healthy eating among low-income patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated body mass index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.