ArticlePloS one2026
Sound-evoked pupil dilation quantifies misophonic symptoms.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Misophonia symptom severity is linked to impaired flexibility and heightened rumination.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Disgusting Sounds on Pupil Diameter of Misophonic and Non-Misophonic Listeners.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Visual disgust constricts pupils in response to misophonic movies.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misophonia is a debilitating disorder where seemingly innocuous sounds (often human made, such as chewing or throat clearing) evoke intense negative cognitive, emotional and physical "fight-or-flight" responses. Recent studies reported alarmingly high prevalence across different countries and population characteristics, revealing an urgent need for a better understanding of this condition as well as improved measurement and diagnostic tools. First, current misophonia symptom measurements rely on (subjective) self-reports, and different studies employ various diagnostic approaches and cut-off scores. There is an urgent need for a complementary (objective) psychophysiological measurement tool. Second, the role of "mild" or "moderate" symptoms is currently topic of debate: are they still manifestations of the misophonic disorder? Here, we employ pupillometry to map out arousal responses to misophonia trigger sounds. We show that (i) pupil dilation can reliably differentiate misophonic responses from responses to generally unpleasant sounds (such as nails on chalk board), (ii) the "milder cases" of misophonia still show arousal responses characteristic of misophonia, and (iii) pupillometry can even be used to aid diagnosis in an individual; based on only pupil dilation, misophonic symptom severity could be reliably predicted at the level of a single individual. We conclude that even mild misophonic responses can reliably, objectively and cost-effectively be indexed by pupil-linked arousal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.