ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
LSTM-attention-guided graph neural networks for integrated genotype-Environment modeling in maize yield prediction.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a deep-learning framework that combines an LSTM, a graph neural network (GNN), and transformer-style attention to model genotype-environment (G×E) effects for maize yield prediction. Weather data for a growing season is summarized using LSTM and encoded into a 21-dimensional embedding that is used as the environment node feature; 437,214 SNPs are summarized into 548 principal components that instantiate genotype nodes. Multi-head attention dynamically weights the edges during message passing. Three architectures are compared: A (fully bipartite graph), B (A with intra-set top-k similarity within genotype and within environment), and C (B with a single learnable supernode readout that attends over all nodes after message passing). The joint representations feed a compact MLP for yield prediction. Using a forward-time split (2014-2021 train; 2022 test with unseen genotypes and unseen environments), performance improves monotonically from A to C: A (RMSE 2.7749, PCC 0.4115, R2 0.1693), B (2.3683, 0.6622, 0.4385), C (2.2120, 0.6945, 0.4823). Compared to A, C has a reduction in RMSE by 0.5629 (∼20.3%) and an increase in PCC by 0.283 (∼68.8%), indicating that global, content-adaptive aggregation promotes local G×E propagation. Performance of proposed approach remains consistent regardless of the number of genotypes per environment and has strong performance under variable or unbalanced genotype sampling expression across environments. The proposed approach is compared with methods from the Global G×E Prediction Competition and show that two of three architectures improve predictive performance, with the best architecture achieving a lower RMSE (2.2120) and a higher Pearson correlation (0.6945) than the competition-winning model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.