ArticleScientific reports2026
Bioinformatics and experimental validation of druggable targets in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common metabolic disease with high heterogeneity and currently lacks approved targeted therapies. Identifying druggable genes with diagnostic relevance and potential translational value may facilitate further research into precision medicine approaches for NAFLD. This study integrated transcriptome data from three independent GEO datasets (GSE33814, GSE63067, and GSE89632) and used sva and limma to correct for batch effects. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), druggable genes obtained from DGIdb, and genes from WGCNA modules significantly associated with NAFLD were intersected to identify candidate genes. Candidate genes were systematically evaluated using functional enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG, GSEA), immune infiltration analysis (CIBERSORT), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and co-expression networks. Finally, the expression of key genes was verified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF). A total of nine key candidate drug targets were identified: FABP4, ADAMTS1, FOS, GPR88, IL1RL1, CD52, JUN, SERPINE1, and THBS1. These genes are primarily involved in metabolism, inflammatory response, extracellular matrix remodeling, and immune regulation. ROC analysis showed that FOS and JUN had high diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, IHC and IF results demonstrated that CD52 was significantly upregulated in NAFLD tissues, suggesting its potential relevance as a candidate target for further investigation. This study systematically identified key druggable genes for NAFLD through bioinformatics analysis and partially validated selected candidates experimentally. In particular, CD52 was upregulated in NAFLD tissues, suggesting a potential association with NAFLD-related pathological alterations. These findings provide new insights into the molecular pathogenesis of NAFLD and may provide a basis for future target validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.