Evidence mapPaperPMID 42162470Full record

GuidelineWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026

[Individualizing antihypertensive therapy in diabetes mellitus. Guidelines of the Austrian Diabetes Association (Update 2026)].

Christoph H Saely, Gerit-Holger Schernthaner, Johanna Maria Brix, Renate Klauser-Braun, Emanuel Zitt, Heinz Drexel, Guntram Schernthaner

Abstract readReviewPractice GuidelineEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Guideline in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christoph H SaelyVIVIT Institut Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Österreich.
Gerit-Holger SchernthanerKlinische Abteilung für Angiologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich. gerit.schernthaner@meduniwien.ac.at.
Johanna Maria Brix1. Medizinische Abteilung mit Diabetologie, Endokrinologie und Nephrologie, Klinik Landstraße, Wien, Österreich.
Renate Klauser-Braun3. Medizinische Abteilung, Klinik Donaustadt, Wien, Österreich.
Emanuel ZittInnere Medizin III, LKH Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Österreich.
Heinz DrexelVIVIT Institut Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Österreich.
Guntram SchernthanerKlinische Abteilung für Angiologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the most important comorbidities of diabetes, significantly contributing to increased mortality and leading to macrovascular and microvascular complications. When assessing the medical priorities for patients with diabetes, treating hypertension should be a primary consideration. In the present review practical approaches to hypertension in diabetes, including individualized targets for preventing specific complications are discussed according to the current evidence and guidelines. Blood pressure values of 120-129/70-79 mm Hg are associated with the best outcome; most importantly, at least blood pressure values < 140/90 mm Hg should be achieved in most patients. Most patients with diabetes require combination therapy to achieve blood pressure goals; agents with clear evidence of cardiovascular risk reduction should be used (including, besides angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists and thiazide diuretics), preferable in single pill combinations. Once the target is achieved, antihypertensive drugs should be continued. The use of SGLT‑2 inhibitors and GLP‑1 receptor agonists contribute to blood pressure lowering in diabetes. This also holds true für the newly available combined GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist tirzepatide. Since the last release of these guidelines evidence from clinical trials has become available that supports more stringent blood pressure control in diabetes, which is reflected in international guidelines and has also been adopted in these recommendations. The individualization of blood pressure management, however, remains a core recommendation of the Austrian Diabetes Association.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesHypertensionPrecision MedicineAustriaDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicAntihypertensive AgentsCombination therapyMultimodal therapyOutcomeReduction of complicationsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42162470
PMCPMC13190778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.