ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
A hybrid deep learning framework for accurate breast cancer classification using MRI images.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate detection of breast cancer is crucial to enhance patient results, especially in high-risk populations where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is intensively used. This study shows a deep learning-based framework for the automatic classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using MRI images. To guarantee accurate patient-level annotations, a large-scale dataset comprising around 25,000 breast MRI images was constructed using an extensive preprocessing and labeling procedure. A hybrid feature-fusion model that integrates MobileNetV2 and VGG16 in a parallel structure was extensively compared and examined with a number of transfer learning-based convolutional neural network designs, such as VGG16, MobileNetV2, and DenseNet121. Each model was trained utilizing a two-stage approach that included frozen training and fine-tuning after being initiated with ImageNet pre-trained weights. Accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1-score, and ROC-AUC metrics were used to evaluate the model's performance. Having 97.79% accuracy, 96.62% recall, and a ROC-AUC value of 0.9983, the hybrid MobileNetV2-VGG16 model topped all single-model architectures, according to experimental results. The results show that hybrid transfer learning approaches can offer a potential option for computer-aided diagnosis systems and more consistent and reliable classification performance for breast MRI-based cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.