ArticleBMC research notes2026
A model for prediction of recurrence risk after zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence after fluoroscopy-free radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), and to develop and validate a nomogram model for individualized prediction of postprocedural PAF recurrence risk.
resultsClinical data of 204 PAF patients undergoing initial fluoroscopy-free RFA were retrospectively analyzed with a median 18.7-month follow-up, and 20.6% of patients had recurrence.Age, left atrial diameter, hypertension, and PAF disease duration were confirmed as independent recurrence risk factors. The validated nomogram showed excellent predictive performance, with C-indexes of 0.813 and 0.805 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Time-dependent ROC analyses revealed favorable AUC values for 6-month, 1-year and 2-year recurrence prediction. Calibration metrics and sensitivity analysis verified the model's favorable stability and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.