Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42163430›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2026

Chromatin remodelling: a driving force in reverse mechanotransduction.

Julie Buisson, Florent Colin, Anna Labernadie, Morgane Rabineau, Dominique Vautier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie BuissonInserm UMR_S1121, CNRS EMR 70002, Université de Strasbourg, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0009-0006-7708-0944
Florent ColinInserm UMR_S1121, CNRS EMR 70002, Université de Strasbourg, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0527-2879
Anna LabernadieCentro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, Cell Behaviour and Tissue Bioengineering Group, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5768-5088
Morgane RabineauInserm UMR_S1121, CNRS EMR 70002, Université de Strasbourg, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7325-7518
Dominique VautierInserm UMR_S1121, CNRS EMR 70002, Université de Strasbourg, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3834-4899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin serves as the dynamic carrier of genetic and epigenetic information in eukaryotic cells, playing a pivotal role in maintaining nuclear shape, mechanical stability, and cellular function. Aberrant nuclear morphology, often observed in mechanically stressed environments or diseases such as progeria and muscular dystrophy, correlates with nuclear dysfunction, DNA damage, and disrupted mechanotransduction. Chromatin exists in two main configurations - compacted heterochromatin and decompacted euchromatin - each regulating gene expression and cellular behaviour through epigenetic modifications. Histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases modulate chromatin compaction, while histone methylation introduces further regulatory complexity. Chromatin's viscoelastic properties enable it to store and restore mechanical energy, acting as a mechanosensitive component within the nucleus. External forces propagate from the extracellular matrix through focal adhesions, the cytoskeleton, and the nuclear lamina to chromatin, forming a direct mechanotransduction pathway. However, the reverse pathway - how internal nuclear forces generated during chromatin remodelling influence the nuclear membrane, cytoskeleton, and cell adhesion - remains poorly understood. This review explores the role of chromatin as a tensegrity element, capable of generating mechanical forces through condensate formation. It examines evidence supporting chromatin decompaction as a regulator of reverse mechanotransduction and identifies potential mechanical partners involved in this process. Understanding these mechanisms may elucidate how chromatin dynamics contribute to cellular fate decisions and disease pathogenesis.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsCell NucleusCytoskeletonEpigenesis, GeneticHeterochromatinHumansChromatinHeterochromatincellular mechanosensingchromatin force generationchromatin mechanicsheterochromatin/euchromatin remodellingReverse mechanotransduction

Identifiers

PMID42163430
PMCPMC13240963

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.