ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Blood pressure variability plays a critical role in determining the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke combined with hypertension.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with hypertension exhibit high blood pressure variability (BPV), which is associated with an increased risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and poor post-stroke outcomes. Therefore, managing BPV may help reduce the incidence of AIS and improve patient prognosis. Aim: This prospective cohort study investigated the effects of BPV regulation on the prognosis of patients with AIS and hypertension, using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores as primary outcomes to inform individualized treatment strategies. Methods: Patients with AIS from December 2021 to June 2024 were included in the study and divided into two groups based on systolic BPV (SBPV) measured more than 24 h after symptom onset: the control group (SBPV 10-20%) and the observation group (SBPV outside 10-20%). The observation group received antihypertensive regimen adjustments based on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) during hospitalization, and the group was subsequently stratified into Groups 1 and 2 according to the improvement in SBPV assessed at the two-week outpatient follow-up after the intervention. Additionally, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were collected during the acute phase and again after 90 days. Results: A total of 75 patients were included. The observation group had higher acute-phase diastolic BPV ( Conclusion: Despite the small sample, our findings suggest that BPV may serve as a prognostic marker for functional outcomes in AIS. Tailored antihypertensive therapy aimed at reducing BPV showed a preliminary association with improved patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.