Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164366›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026

Efficacy and safety of a novel 18 mmol/L sodium citrate hemofiltration solution in continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Pei-Hong Zhao, An-Qi Liu, Ya-Lei Chen, Hu-Nan Liu, Zhen Li, Xiao-Lu Zhang, Nian-Fang Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pei-Hong ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing Electric Power Hospital of State Grid Company of China, Beijing, China.
An-Qi LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing Electric Power Hospital of State Grid Company of China, Beijing, China.
Ya-Lei ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing Electric Power Hospital of State Grid Company of China, Beijing, China.
Hu-Nan LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing Electric Power Hospital of State Grid Company of China, Beijing, China.
Zhen LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing Electric Power Hospital of State Grid Company of China, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Lu ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing Electric Power Hospital of State Grid Company of China, Beijing, China.
Nian-Fang LuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing Electric Power Hospital of State Grid Company of China, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) serves as a cornerstone of supportive care for critically ill patients. The selection of anticoagulation strategies and hemofiltration solutions is pivotal to the safety and efficacy of CRRT. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been widely adopted in CRRT practice; however, it is associated with cumbersome operational procedures. Furthermore, traditional high-concentration sodium citrate anticoagulants are associated with an increased risk of metabolic complications. This study compared a novel 18 mmol/L sodium citrate hemofiltration solution with the traditional RCA protocol, with the aim of evaluating the safety, efficacy, and clinical convenience of the novel solution in CRRT for critically ill patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 105 CRRT sessions in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Beijing Electric Power Hospital between July 1 and September 30, 2025. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and use of CRRT with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). Exclusion criteria were contraindications to citrate anticoagulation, psychiatric illness, or pregnancy/lactation. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anticoagulation method: sodium citrate hemofiltration solution group (n=53) and traditional regional citrate anticoagulation (tRCA) group (n=52). We collected and compared baseline characteristics, CRRT treatment parameters, post-filter ionized calcium levels, complication rates, and workflow parameters between the two groups. Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of gender distribution, comorbidities or disease severity indicators, including Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score. The sodium citrate hemofiltration solution group demonstrated a significantly longer mean CRRT duration compared to the tRCA group (50.91±13.07 Conclusions: Sodium citrate hemofiltration replacement solution enables effective anticoagulation, prolongs filter lifespan, reduces metabolic complications, and simplifies clinical procedures in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT. These findings support the potential utility of sodium citrate hemofiltration solution in the ICU, though confirmation in prospective trials is warranted.

Indexed as

Anticoagulation methodcontinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)intensive care unit (ICU)regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA)sodium citrate hemofiltration replacement solution

Identifiers

PMID42164366
PMCPMC13184210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.