ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Risk factors for kidney stone recurrence and early prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrence of kidney stone disease (KSD) remains a significant challenge in current clinical practice. There is a paucity of systematic evidence of independent risk factors and performance of early prediction models for KSD recurrence. Hence, this paper intended to systematically evaluate the independent risk factors for KSD recurrence and the feasibility of early prediction. Methods: Available original studies about risk factors and prediction models for postoperative KSD recurrence were systematically searched for in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until July 2024. The risk of bias was appraised via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Eighteen studies on risk factors for KSD recurrence and 12 studies on prediction models were included. Younger age [odds ratio (OR) =1.428, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.262-1.616], diabetes mellitus (OR =1.428, 95% CI: 1.262-1.616), hypertension (OR =1.428, 95% CI: 1.262-1.616), and family history of KSD (OR =1.428, 95% CI: 1.262-1.616) were independent risk factors for KSD recurrence. Current prediction models were mainly constructed based on these common clinical characteristics. The area under the curve for recurrence prediction was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78) in the training set and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.60-0.79) in the validation set. Conclusions: There are independent risk factors for postoperative KSD recurrence. However, the predictive performance of the prediction models constructed based on these factors faces challenges. More efficient predictive factors should be incorporated in constructing models with higher predictive accuracy for postoperative KSD recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.