ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2026
External validation of the feeding intolerance prediction model (NOFI) in critically ill patients: A post hoc analysis of a large-scale randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Feeding intolerance (FI) is associated with poor prognosis of critically ill patients. This study aims to externally validate the performance of a FI model (NOFI), which was developed using primary diagnosis, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade to predict FI occurrence in critically ill patients. Methods: The NOFI model was developed using a retrospective cohort and was preliminarily validated in a prospective study. A post hoc analysis was then conducted using data from a multi-center randomized controlled trial to select patients who initiated early enteral nutrition as an external validation dataset. The predictive performance of NOFI was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. FI risk stratification was defined as follows: The NOFI prediction probability >0.85 (high risk), 0.30-0.85 (middle risk), or <0.30 (low risk). Multivariate Cox regression was performed to explore the association between FI risk and 28-day mortality. Results: Among the 1545 patients included, 856 developed FI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for NOFI was 0.723 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.697 to 0.748). The prediction model was able to accurately predict FI, with a sensitivity of 75.8%, specificity of 61.1%, positive predictive value of 70.8%, and negative predictive value of 67.0%. FI risk stratification based on NOFI was associated with 28-day mortality ( Conclusions: NOFI demonstrated reasonable performance in the prediction of FI. Patients at high risk for FI as stratified by the NOFI had a higher risk of 28-day mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.