Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164584›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2026

External validation of the feeding intolerance prediction model (NOFI) in critically ill patients: A post hoc analysis of a large-scale randomized controlled trial.

Youquan Wang, Yanhua Li, Hongxiang Li, Nan Li, Xinyu Li, Dongfang Lv, Lingling Bao, Xuewen Feng, Lu Ke, Dong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Youquan WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yanhua LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Hongxiang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Nan LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xinyu LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Dongfang LvDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Lingling BaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xuewen FengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Lu KeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Dong ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Feeding intolerance (FI) is associated with poor prognosis of critically ill patients. This study aims to externally validate the performance of a FI model (NOFI), which was developed using primary diagnosis, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade to predict FI occurrence in critically ill patients. Methods: The NOFI model was developed using a retrospective cohort and was preliminarily validated in a prospective study. A post hoc analysis was then conducted using data from a multi-center randomized controlled trial to select patients who initiated early enteral nutrition as an external validation dataset. The predictive performance of NOFI was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. FI risk stratification was defined as follows: The NOFI prediction probability >0.85 (high risk), 0.30-0.85 (middle risk), or <0.30 (low risk). Multivariate Cox regression was performed to explore the association between FI risk and 28-day mortality. Results: Among the 1545 patients included, 856 developed FI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for NOFI was 0.723 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.697 to 0.748). The prediction model was able to accurately predict FI, with a sensitivity of 75.8%, specificity of 61.1%, positive predictive value of 70.8%, and negative predictive value of 67.0%. FI risk stratification based on NOFI was associated with 28-day mortality ( Conclusions: NOFI demonstrated reasonable performance in the prediction of FI. Patients at high risk for FI as stratified by the NOFI had a higher risk of 28-day mortality.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomesExternal validationFeeding intoleranceIntensive care unitNomogram

Identifiers

PMID42164584
PMCPMC13184461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.