Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164588›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2026

Validation of SOFA-2 score in sepsis and exploration of its extension with additional immune markers.

Fei Pei, Bin Gu, Zimeng Liu, Guangzhen Li, Yao Nie, Minying Chen, Yongjun Liu, Xiangdong Guan, Qingui Chen, Jianfeng Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02867267 (The Efficacy and Safety of Thymosin Alpha 1 for Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02867267 phase3completednot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Thymosin Alpha 1 for Sepsis: a Multicenter , Double-Blinded, Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2016 to 2021Enrolled1,106ConditionsSepsisArmsThymosin alpha 1, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fei PeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bin GuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zimeng LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guangzhen LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yao NieDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Minying ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yongjun LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiangdong GuanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qingui ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jianfeng WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is central to the diagnosis and management of sepsis, but its recent update has not been specifically evaluated in sepsis. Moreover, it is unknown whether adding immune markers beyond white blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte counts-excluded in the recent update-could further improve its performance. The present study aimed to validate SOFA-2 in patients with sepsis and to examine its performance following integration of supplementary immune markers. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial in adult patients with sepsis conducted in China from September 2016 to December 2020. Both versions of SOFA were re-calculated at randomization, with an XGBoost-derived extension that incorporated additional immune markers, including WBC, lymphocyte counts, monocyte human leucocyte antigen-DR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and percentage of regulatory T cells. The discriminatory performance for predicting intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), was examined. Results: Among the 1089 patients with sepsis (median age 64.5 years; 31.1% female), 9.2% died during ICU stay. The SOFA-2 was lower than the SOFA-1 (median [interquartile range] 6 [4-9] Conclusions: Updating from SOFA-1 to SOFA-2 results in comparable score distributions and sustains the discriminatory capacity for predicting ICU mortality in patients with sepsis. Immune dysregulation in sepsis may be too complex to capture with simple baseline markers. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02867267.

Indexed as

BiomarkersImmune systemSepsisSequential organ failure assessmentValidation study

Identifiers

PMID42164588
PMCPMC13184492

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.