Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42164748›Full record

ArticleJournal of aging research2026

Evaluating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Utility of the Home Alone Intervention: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Robyn W Birkeland, Stephanie N Ingvalson, Grace M Savard, Amy Hobday, Dana Urbanski, Renée Pepin, Laura N Gitlin, Jill Cigliana, Joseph E Gaugler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aging research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robyn W BirkelandSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6093-046X
Stephanie N IngvalsonSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3309-6245
Grace M SavardSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3729-2165
Amy HobdaySchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0823-6543
Dana UrbanskiDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, indiana.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-9860
Renée PepinDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth University, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA, dartmouth.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8011-1012
Laura N GitlinCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, drexel.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-473X
Jill CiglianaMemory Care Home Solutions, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2326-0863
Joseph E GauglerSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4797-485X

Funding

Home Alone: Developing a Home-Based Intervention for People with Cognitive Impairment Who Live AloneR21AG080744 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GAUGLER, JOSEPH E. · 2023 to 2024
$440k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG080744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Loneliness and social isolation are associated with significant negative impacts on physical and mental health. Living alone increases one's risk for loneliness and social isolation. Many older adults live alone, including individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and subjective memory decline. Living alone with a diagnosis of MCI or subjective memory decline adds greater complexity, stress, and difficulty in navigating daily life due to loneliness, social isolation, and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Despite these concerns, there is a dearth of support interventions for older adults who live alone with memory decline. Home Alone is a new support program created for this unique population of older adults in continuing to live independently and safely while engaging in social and meaningful activities. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the novel Home Alone support program. Methods: Home Alone is a seven-session psychosocial and psychoeducational intervention that provides one-on-one, tailored coaching in person or via telehealth. Home Alone focuses on promoting home safety strategies and modifications and encouraging personally meaningful activity and social engagement through behavioral activation-based tasks. Fifteen older adults who live alone and have MCI or subjective memory decline enrolled in the 3-month feasibility study to evaluate the initial program and inform its refinement. Mixed methods data were collected from 1- and 3-month follow-up surveys. Additional qualitative data on participants' experiences of the Home Alone intervention were collected at post-intervention interviews. Results: Results demonstrated preliminary feasibility, utility, and acceptance of Home Alone. Qualitative analyses of participant interviews identified useful aspects of the intervention, including home safety, meaningful activity, and socialization, as well as recommendations for program refinement. Discussion: The Home Alone program was well-received and viewed as valuable by participants. Participant feedback and recommendations were incorporated to further improve the intervention. The refined Home Alone intervention is now being evaluated in a larger pilot trial.

Indexed as

home safetymild cognitive impairmentsolo livingsubjective memory declinesupport program

Identifiers

PMID42164748
PMCPMC13185217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.