Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42165397›Full record

SynthesisBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Educational Leadership for Sustainable Capacity Building Towards Enhancing Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Computer-Aided Drug Design and Network Pharmacology: A Systematic Review.

Peter Chinedu Agu, Miracle Uzochukwu Okafor, Chioma Blessing Momah, Patrick Maduabuchi Aja, Mohammad Arif, Jun Lu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter Chinedu AguKey Laboratory of Luminescence Analysis and Molecular Sensing (Ministry of Education), College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chinese Medicine, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4739-2040
Miracle Uzochukwu OkaforSchool of Foreign Languages, Hanjiang Normal University, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-6650
Chioma Blessing MomahCollege of Cardiothoracic Nursing, University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Patrick Maduabuchi AjaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Busenyi, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-9027
Mohammad ArifFaculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Jun LuKey Laboratory of Luminescence Analysis and Molecular Sensing (Ministry of Education), College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chinese Medicine, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1699-8835

Funding

Hundred Talents Plan of Chongqing and Southwest University's 'Gathering Talent Project' SWU116068Key Project of Innovation Research 2035 Pilot Plan of Southwest University SWU-XDZD22007Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the pharmaceutical sciences, particularly in network pharmacology and computer-aided drug design (CADD), successful multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial for sustainable capacity growth. This systematic study investigates how interdisciplinary research methods can be strengthened and creative technology integration may be fostered sustainably through educational leadership. For papers published between 2010 and 2024, a systematic literature search was carried out in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. "Network pharmacology," "interdisciplinary collaboration," "pharmaceutical sciences," "computer-aided drug design," and "educational leadership" were among the search phrases used. Peer-reviewed papers, case studies, and reports discussing leadership in multidisciplinary pharmaceutical sciences research or instruction were among the eligible studies. Out of 558 identified records, 109 studies were included in accordance with PRISMA requirements (WoS = 476; Scopus = 82). With 10% of research focusing on CADD, 22% on educational leadership, and 68% on more general, multidisciplinary viewpoints, the results indicated a paradigm shift towards interdisciplinary collaboration. However, limitations were found because educational leadership was not included in CADD and network pharmacology frameworks in several studies. The main challenges to productive cooperation were identified as resource limitations, policy gaps, and communication difficulties. This analysis highlights how institutional frameworks, regulatory support, and adaptive leadership techniques are necessary to facilitate long-term knowledge sharing, innovation absorption, and better research outcomes in the pharmaceutical sciences. Therefore, enhancing educational leadership opens the door to long-term effects and sustained capacity building in multidisciplinary pharmaceutical research.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingComputer-Aided DesignDrug DesignLeadershipNetwork PharmacologyCooperative BehaviorHumanscomputer‐aided drug design (CADD)educational leadershipinterdisciplinary collaborationnetwork pharmacologypharmaceutical sciencessustainable capacity building

Identifiers

PMID42165397
PMCPMC13418763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.