ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Comparison of fibrin glue posterior fixation and omentopexy in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most commonly performed weight loss surgery. Omentopexy is believed to help reduce the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bleeding, gastric leakage, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In recent years, fibrin glue posterior fixation has emerged as an alternative method shown to reduce gastrointestinal symptoms after LSG surgery. However, the comparative evidence between these two fixed techniques is still limited. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of two gastric fixation methods, fibrin glue posterior fixation and Omentopexy, in LSG. This retrospective study included 649 patients who underwent LSG between 2022 and 2024, divided into two groups: fibrin glue posterior fixation (n = 331) and Omentopexy (n = 318). A 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the groups. After matching, 480 patients were included (240 per group). There were no significant differences between the fibrin glue posterior fixation group and the Omentopexy group in operative time or intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05). The incidence of PONV in the two groups was 6.6% (16/240) and 5.8% (14/240), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 0.8% (2/240), and there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). There was 1 case of gastric leakage (0.4%) in the fibrin glue posterior fixation group, and no gastric leakage was observed in the Omentopexy group, and the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Neither group experienced gastric torsion. The incidence of postoperative GERD was 5.8% (14/240) and 7.5% (18/240), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). In addition, both groups of postoperative bleeding patients underwent reoperation, with a reoperation rate of 0.8% (2/240), and there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). This study demonstrates that there were no significant differences in short-term postoperative complications between fibrin glue posterior fixation and Omentopexy in LSG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42166091What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.