ArticleJournal of psychopathology and clinical science2026
In praise of scientific open relationships: Commentary on Caspi et al. (2026).
Article in Journal of psychopathology and clinical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What does psychopathology research have to gain by studying all mental disorders at the same time?Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This commentary responds to arguments presented in Caspi et al.'s (see record 2026-80066-001) viewpoint article. I endorse the authors' overall argument but note that exactly how many mental disorders one needs to study at a time will likely depend on the specific research question. I also describe how transdiagnostic research requires strong norms of data and credit sharing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.