Trial reportPloS one2026
Comparison between two different concentrations of ropivacaine in pericapsular nerve group block for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective pain control during spinal anesthesia positioning remains a clinical challenge in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The pericapsular nerve group block, a novel ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique, has shown promise for alleviating hip pain, yet the optimal concentration of local anesthetics for this approach remains unclear. In this randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial involving 102 patients, we compared the analgesic efficacy of two concentrations of ropivacaine (0.375% vs. 0.5%) administered via pericapsular nerve group block prior to spinal anesthesia. Patients receiving 0.5% ropivacaine reported significantly lower pain scores during positioning and demonstrated prolonged postoperative analgesia up to 48 hours, without a corresponding increase in adverse events. Both concentrations improved positioning quality, reduced opioid requirements, and enhanced recovery compared to controls who received standard intravenous analgesic supplementation (including preoperative midazolam and ketorolac, and postoperative sufentanil PCA), though the higher concentration yielded modest additional benefits. These findings suggest that a 0.5% ropivacaine pericapsular nerve group block may offer superior perioperative analgesia for hip arthroplasty without compromising safety, while highlighting the need to balance analgesic potency with potential motor effects. This study informs optimization of nerve block protocols to improve perioperative outcomes in a high-risk surgical population. This study informs optimization of nerve block protocols to improve perioperative outcomes in a high-risk surgical population. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2400089440).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.