ArticlePloS one2026
USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge performance by disability, race, and ethnicity in U.S. medical students: A multi-site study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceWith the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail, USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) has become a high-stakes component of residency selection. This shift raises concerns that increased reliance on Step 2 CK may exacerbate existing inequities, particularly for medical students with disabilities and those with intersecting marginalized identities.
objectiveTo examine differences in USMLE Step 2 CK performance by disability status, race, ethnicity, and their intersections among U.S. medical students.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the Pathways II dataset, comprising deidentified student-level data from nine U.S. MD-granting medical schools. Graduated students from the 2020-2023 cohorts were included. Medical students with disabilities were defined as those formally registered with institutional disability resource offices and were matched 1:2 with nondisabled peers by institution, gender, graduation cohort, and MCAT score. Race and ethnicity were categorized as White, Asian, underrepresented in medicine (URiM, including American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander), or Other. Disability categories included ADHD, learning, psychological, mobility/sensory, chronic health, or other. Multivariable linear regression models estimated adjusted Step 2 CK score differences by disability status, race, ethnicity, and their interactions, adjusting for MCAT score and clustering standard errors at the school level.
resultsAmong 1,350 students, 448 (33.2%) had a registered disability. The mean Step 2 CK score was 244.3 (SD, 15.1). Students with disabilities scored lower than nondisabled peers (mean 239.6 vs 246.7; adjusted β, -7.02; 95% CI, -8.76 to -5.28). Students with ADHD, learning, or psychological disabilities scored 9-11 points lower than nondisabled peers (P < .001). URiM students scored lower than White students overall (adjusted β, -8.50; 95% CI, -10.74 to -6.25). Intersectional analysis demonstrated that disparities were largest among URiM and Asian students with disabilities.
conclusionsMedical students with disabilities experience significant disparities in Step 2 CK performance, particularly those with cognitive-based disabilities and intersecting marginalized identities. As Step 2 CK plays a larger role in residency selection, addressing structural barriers in assessment and accommodation processes is critical to advancing equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.