ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Molecular Analysis of Single Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles with Improved Robustness and Accuracy.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as key analytes in liquid biopsy analysis, as they inherit the molecular characteristics of their parental cells. For cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring, tumor-derived EVs can serve as surrogate markers of their originating tumor cells. However, technical challenges arise from EV heterogeneity, as molecular signals from a rare EV subpopulation are often neglected in bulk-EV analysis. This limitation underscores the importance of single-EV analysis, enabling the detection and analysis of individual tumor EVs. While multiple single-EV technologies have been introduced, accurately detecting and quantifying rare target EVs in clinical samples remains challenging in practice. Here, we developed a set of protocols that improve the selectivity and accuracy of single-EV analysis by minimizing false-positive signals and enhancing assay robustness. Specifically, we improved the validity of data processing for single-EV imaging, optimized EV labeling procedures, and applied colocalization analysis between cancer-specific markers and EV signals. We demonstrated that the approach is applicable to two orthogonal single-EV technologies, fluorescence imaging and nanoflow cytometry, yielding consistent results across the two methods and significantly improving the detection accuracy of tumor-derived EVs spiked in plasma samples. Collectively, we demonstrated precise single-EV profiling with high accuracy and selectivity, with evident benefits for the applicability of EV analysis in clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.