Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168225›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026

Cell trajectory inference based on schrödinger problem and a mechanistic model of stochastic gene expression.

Clémence Fournié, Elias Ventre, Ulysse Herbach, Aymeric Baradat, Olivier Gandrillon, Fabien Crauste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clémence FourniéUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, MAP5, F-75006 Paris, France. clemence.fournie@math.cnrs.fr.
Elias VentreCOMPO, Inria Méditerranée, Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Inserm UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, UM105, Aix-Marseille Université, 13273 Marseille, France.
Ulysse HerbachUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, Inria, IECL, Nancy, France.
Aymeric BaradatUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS UMR5208, Institut Camille Jordan, 43 Blvd du 11 Novembre 1918, , F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Olivier GandrillonUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007 Lyon, France.
Fabien CrausteUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, MAP5, F-75006 Paris, France. fabien.crauste@math.cnrs.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche PEPR Santé NumériqueCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique TROPIC project under Action 80PRIME 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular differentiation is the biological process that leads a cell to opt for a particular cellular identity. Recently, single-cell RNA sequencing has enabled the simultaneous measurement of gene expression levels at specific times for a large number of individual cells and a large number of genes. Repeating such measurements at different time points gives them access to the temporal variation, or transport, of a distribution on a gene expression space. The whole temporal trajectory of distributions thus characterizes the differentiation process at the population level, but trajectories of individual cells are still out of reach since most measurement techniques are destructive. The optimal transport theory that has been used so far to infer cellular differentiation trajectories from time-stamped single-cell RNA-seq data involves solving the so-called Schrödinger problem in its most common version. This implies assuming that cells move, in the gene expression space, by diffusion. Yet, real gene dynamics are much more complex. In the present work, we assume that mRNA dynamics are characterized by brief and important production of RNA, with long periods of inactivity in between, and consider the so-called Bursty model of gene dynamics. We use this model to define a reference process for the Schrödinger problem. By comparing the solutions of the Schrödinger problems with a Diffusive and a Bursty reference process, under different conditions, we show that the Bursty model provides a better approximation of the underlying gene dynamics than the standard Diffusive process when inferring cell trajectories.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAlgorithmsAnimalsCell DifferentiationComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, GeneticRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisStochastic ProcessesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID42168225
PMCPMC13463083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.