ArticleScientific reports2026
Increasing the ecological footprint significantly reduces life expectancy and increases infant mortality rates in Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effects of environmental degradation, proxied by the ecological footprint, on human health outcomes, particularly life expectancy and infant mortality, in Ethiopia. Using annual data for the period between 1980 and 2023, the study utilized long-run cointegration techniques: fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS), canonical cointegration regression (CCR), and Toda‒Yamamoto Granger causality. The results show a statistical association where a 1% increase in the ecological footprint is associated with a 0.162% increase in the infant mortality rate, and a 0.0089% reduction in life expectancy, suggesting a potential correlation between environmental pressure and health outcomes. Conversely, economic growth (0.43% increase in life expectancy per 1% increase in GDP) and public health expenditures (0.799% increase in life expectancy per 1% increase in spending) are positive long-term determinants. Bidirectional causality exists between health outcomes, economic growth, and environmental degradation. This study suggests that, pending further verification of causal mechanisms, policymakers may consider integrated strategies that simultaneously address environmental sustainability and public health investments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.