Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168489›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

CApEsid biOfilm: a suggested pipeline for clinical phage microbiology for biofilm infections based on comparative method study.

Amit Rimon, Ron Braunstein, Ortal Yerushalmy, Noa Katz, Lidor Yosef, Yitzchak Gvili, Shunit Coppenhagen-Glazer, Ronen Hazan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amit RimonInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Ron BraunsteinInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Ortal YerushalmyInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Noa KatzInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Lidor YosefInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Yitzchak GviliInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Shunit Coppenhagen-GlazerInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Ronen HazanInstitute of Biomedical and Oral Research (IBOR), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel. RonenH@ekmd.huji.ac.il.

Funding

Israel Science Foundation IPMP Grant ISF1349/20Milgrom Family Support Program 3015005777Rosetrees Trust A2232United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation 2017123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of antibiotic-resistant infections, particularly those involving biofilms, presents a significant global health threat. Phage therapy, the use of bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents, offers promising solutions to this crisis. A critical component of phage therapy is the assessment of phage efficacy, in both the presence and absence of antibiotics, prior to clinical application. While considerable progress has been made using planktonic bacterial cultures, there remains an urgent need for standardized methods to evaluate phage efficacy against biofilms. In this study, we address this gap by systematically comparing ten different methods for quantifying phage activity in biofilm settings. Each method was evaluated using a panel of five anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa phages, which were tested against both planktonic and biofilm cultures. Based on these comparisons, we propose a robust pipeline for detecting phage activity in biofilms. This pipeline, termed CApEsid biOfilm, integrates modified colony-forming unit (CFU) assays using stainless steel washers, crystal violet staining, extracellular DNA quantification using a dye, and extracellular ATP measurements. The pipeline was further validated with additional bacterial species and their respective phages. We also demonstrate its utility in detecting interactions between phages and antibiotics. Overall, this work presents a foundational pipeline that may enhance the clinical matching of phages for treating biofilm-associated infections, thereby improving the outcomes of phage therapy.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesBiofilmsPhage TherapyPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsPseudomonas PhagesAdenosine TriphosphateAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansAdenosine TriphosphateAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID42168489
PMCPMC13402588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.