Trial reportLasers in medical science2026
Functional and ultrasonographic evaluation of high intensity laser therapy and Kinesio taping in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is a common post-stroke complication that limits functional recovery and rehabilitation participation. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical, functional, and ultrasonographic superiority of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Kinesio Taping (KT) over each other, as well as in comparison to conventional therapy (COT). The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated into three equal groups (n = 11 each group): Group 1 (Control Group) received COT with sham HILT and sham KT, Group 2 (HILT Group) received COT with active HILT and sham KT, and Group 3 (KT Group) received COT with sham HILT and active KT. COT was performed five days per week for three weeks, HILT was administered in 10 sessions, and KT was applied every other day for three weeks (nine sessions). The primary outcome measure of the study was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score. Secondary outcome measures included pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), passive shoulder range of motion (pROM), ultrasonographic findings, Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (BRS), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). All measures were evaluated at baseline (pre-treatment) and immediately following the intervention period (post-treatment). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and McNemar tests. Groups were sociodemographically comparable (p > 0.05). Post-treatment, all groups exhibited significant improvements in shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation, and BRS, VAS, SPADI, FIM, and HAQ scores (p < 0.05). No significant changes occurred in ultrasonographic findings, shoulder abduction, or internal rotation. Notably, HILT demonstrated superior VAS and SPADI improvements compared to other groups (p < 0.05). HILT provides rapid, clinically significant pain relief and functional recovery in HSP without adverse effects, offering a safe and superior therapeutic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.