ArticleNature biotechnology2026
AI-guided redesign of laboratory-evolved reverse transcriptases enhances prime editing.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Engineered Transformer Base Editor with Enhanced Editing Efficiency.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Article
- Advances in prime editing: Molecular innovations, Large-fragment engineering, and AI-driven design.Biodesign research · 2026Review
- Compound delivery of eVLPs enhances prime editing for targeted genome engineering and high-throughput screening.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although protein engineering and laboratory evolution have been used to optimize prime editors, we show that previous changes that improve prime editor efficiency also compromise protein stability and expression level, limiting performance. To address these limitations, we apply structure-informed artificial intelligence-guided methods such as the inverse-folding network ProteinMPNN to redesign the reverse transcriptase (RT) domains of engineered and evolved prime editors while preserving regions essential for catalysis. Redesigned RTs are extensively mutated, with 30-163 amino acid substitutions, and exhibit enhanced folding stability and soluble expression and up to twofold higher intracellular prime editor protein levels following mRNA delivery. Redesigned PE8 prime editors demonstrate enhanced editing efficiencies across multiple ex vivo contexts, including in several human primary cell types and via several delivery modalities. In mice, editing efficiency is up to 2.9-fold higher than that of state-of-the-art PE6, PE7 and PEmax prime editors. These findings demonstrate a generalizable approach for augmenting laboratory evolution to improve genome editing agents.
Identifiers
42168701What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.